Recognized Scholarship in Military & Criminal Law
In 2007, Major Peter Kageleiry, Jr. published his foundational academic paper,
“Psychological Police Interrogation Methods: Pseudoscience in the Interrogation Room Obscures Justice in the Courtroom”
(193 Mil. L. Rev. 1). Published in the prestigious Military Law Review, the treatise critically evaluated psychological coercion, police deception, and pseudoscientific interrogation methods such as the Reid Technique.
Today, MAJ Kageleiry’s work is routinely relied upon by military appellate courts, law reviews, and innocence project researchers across the United States. As the founding attorney at the Law Office of Peter Kageleiry, Jr., he applies these deep insights directly to defending service members facing court-martial. You can read a complete breakdown of his original research on our official False Confessions Legal Analysis page.
Judicial Opinion
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces | 74 M.J. 137
Authority Impact: Cited by the nation’s highest military tribunal in analyzing confession corroboration standards and the reliability of suspect admissions during coercive questioning.
Law Review
University of San Diego School of Law
Article Citation: Extending Miranda: Prohibition on Police Lies Regarding Incriminating Evidence — Cites Kageleiry on how deceptive tactics distort rational suspect decision-making.
Federal Repository
U.S. Library of Congress Catalog (Vol. 193)
Authority Impact: Permanently cataloged in the federal military legal archives as an essential treatise on military criminal procedure and evidence.
Academic Database
Global Scientific Research Database
Authority Impact: Indexed internationally among legal and psychological research papers focusing on forensic psychology and false confession mechanics.
Law Review
William & Mary Law School
Article Citation: Referenced in constitutional scholarship evaluating Fifth Amendment protections and coercive pre-trial tactics.
Law Review
University of Denver Sturm College of Law
Article Citation: Cited in treatises examining rational choice models versus psychological coercion in modern interrogation rooms.
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
Authority Impact: Indexed by the DOJ as a key reference on systemic causes of wrongful conviction and police interrogation techniques.
Law Review
Georgetown University Law Center
Article Citation: Cited in analysis of custodial interrogation standards and constitutional rights enforcement.
Legal Library
Premier Legal Research Database
Authority Impact: Fully archived and indexed across hundreds of secondary citations in legal academia.
Military Appellate Commentary
Appellate Military Practice Forum
Authority Impact: Cited in appellate jurisprudence discussions regarding UCMJ Article 31(b) rights and involuntary statements.
Law Review
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Article Citation: Referenced in innocence project scholarship evaluating post-conviction relief and flawed confession evidence.
Law Review
UC Davis School of Law
Article Citation: Cited in research analyzing legislative reforms surrounding police deception during suspect interviews.
Bar Association Journal
American Bar Association
Article Citation: Referenced in national defense policy publications advocating for interrogation recording requirements.
Law Review
University of Virginia School of Law
Article Citation: Cited in interdisciplinary research on psychological vulnerabilities during law enforcement questioning.
Law Review
Temple University Beasley School of Law
Article Citation: Cites Kageleiry’s critique of behavioral analysis tools and expert testimony on suspect demeanor.
Military Portal
U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps
Authority Impact: Preserved within core military legal education curricula for training trial defense counsel (TDC).
Institutional Repository
International Legal Studies Repository
Article Citation: Cited in comparative international analyses examining American interrogation methods vs. international standards.
Law Review
Georgetown University Law Center
Article Citation: Cited regarding the misuse of psychological “behavior analysis” as evidence in court-martial proceedings.
Academic Repository
Legal Scholarship Network
Authority Impact: Cited across multiple working papers in legal psychology, law, and criminology.
Primary Firm Source
ucmjlaw.com Primary Archive
Official Resource: Author’s original commentary and full text access on applying false confession defense strategies to modern courts-martial.